1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 53 F.Supp.
  5. 53 F.Supp. 359 (1943)
 

ARKWRIGHT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES

Civil Action No. 1733.

53 F.Supp. 359 (1943)

ARKWRIGHT CORPORATION v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

December 14, 1943.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James S. Y. Ivins, of Washington, D. C., Frank L. Kozol, Lee M. Friedman, and Friedman, Atherton, King & Turner, all of Boston, Mass., and Andrew B. Trudgian, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Frederic G. Rita, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Samuel O. Clark, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Andrew D. Sharpe, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., and Edmund J. Brandon, U. S. Atty., and George F. Garrity, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Boston, Mass., for the Government.

SWEENEY, District Judge.

This is an action to recover taxes which were collected by the Government from the plaintiff under the processing tax laid down in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1933, 7 U.S.C.A. § 601 et seq.

When that tax was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 56 S.Ct. 312, 80 L.Ed. 477, 102 A.L.R. 914, a method for the proper recovery of the tax was set...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases