CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. UNITED STATES


53 F.Supp. 349 (1943)

CORNELL STEAMBOAT CO. v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, S. D. New York.

Judgment Affirmed April 3, 1944.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kirlin, Campbell, Hickox, Keating & McGrann, of New York City (Robert S. Erskine, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Robert L. Pierce, Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., for the United States.

E. M. Reidy, Asst. Chief Counsel, of Washington, D. C., for Interstate Commerce Commission.

Tom C. Clark, Asst. Atty. Gen. (Daniel W. Knowlton, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the United States.

Foley & Martin, of New York City (James A. Martin and Christopher E. Heckman, both of New York City, of counsel), for National Water Carriers Ass'n, Inc., intervenor.

Bingham, Dana & Gould, of Boston, Mass., for Boston Tow Boat Co., Intervenor.


Judgment Affirmed April 3, 1944. See 64 S.Ct. 768.

FRANK, Circuit Judge.

1. Plaintiff contends that, as a tower, it is not a "carrier by water" within the meaning of the Act. We cannot agree. Plaintiff literally "engage[s] in the transportation by water * * * of * * * property * * * for compensation," which is the test under § 302(c) and (d). For the dictionary tells us that, nautically, to transport is "to haul a vessel by hawsers." And a barge is both...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases