KUCHAR v. ARMINGTON

Patent Appeal No. 4668.

133 F.2d 944 (1943)

KUCHAR v. ARMINGTON et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 1, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert G. McCaleb, Robert H. Wendt, and John F. Eakins, all of Chicago, Ill. (James H. Littlehales, of Washington, D. C. of counsel), for appellant.

Hyde & Meyer, Elbert L. Hyde, and George S. Baldwin, all of Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention of the subject matter defined by the two counts in issue (Nos. 1 and 2) to appellant, Joseph Kuchar.

The interference is between appellant's application, No. 743,792, filed September 13, 1934, and appellees' patent, No. 2...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases