WOODBRIDGE v. DU PONT

No. 129.

133 F.2d 904 (1943)

WOODBRIDGE et al. v. DU PONT et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

January 25, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jules Haberman, of Brooklyn, N. Y., for appellants.

Harold R. Medina, of New York City, for appellees.

Before L. HAND, CHASE, and CLARK, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

This case was tried to a jury and at the conclusion of the evidence the plaintiffs made no motion for a directed verdict. Only after the jury had returned a verdict in favor of the defendants, did their counsel raise any question as to the sufficiency of the evidence, which he did by moving for a new trial in the following language: "I move to set aside the verdict on each of these causes of action on the ground that it is against the weight of evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases