MIESSNER v. HOSCHKE

No. 7962.

131 F.2d 865 (1942)

MIESSNER et al. v. HOSCHKE et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided November 2, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, with whom Mr. Spencer B. Michael, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.

Mr. Daniel H. Kane, of New York City, of the Bar of the State of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Harry E. Seidel, of Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before STEPHENS, VINSON, and EDGERTON, Associate Justices.


VINSON, Associate Justice.

An appeal has been taken from a judgment of the District Court dismissing an action instituted by appellants to review, under Section 4915 of the Revised Statutes,1 a decision of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding,2 wherein priority of invention was awarded appellees. In the interests of clarity, the appellants, as well as Miessner, through whom their rights are derived...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases