PER CURIAM.
The chief question upon this appeal turns on Post's purpose in allowing the money to accumulate in the taxpayer's treasury; that was a question of fact as to which there was substantial evidence to support the finding of the Board.
The deductions claimed were likewise correctly disallowed; they were either deductible in other years, or not deductible at all. The result as to them also depended upon questions of fact and there was substantial evidence...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.