MITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA v. SOCIETE PURFINA MARITIME

No. 10179.

133 F.2d 552 (1942)

MITSUBISHI SHOJI KAISHA, Limited, et al. v. SOCIETE PURFINA MARITIME. THE LAURENT MEEUS.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Writ of Certiorari Denied April 5, 1943.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City, and Arch E. Ekdale, of San Pedro, Cal. (John W. Crandall and Geo. Whitefield Betts, Jr., both of New York City, and Arch E. Ekdale, of San Pedro, Cal., of counsel), for appellant Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd.

Martin J. Weil, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant General Petroleum Corporation of Calif.

Bigham, Englar, Jones & Houston and T. Catesby Jones, all of New York City, McCutchen, Olney, Mannon & Greene and Farnham P. Griffiths, all of San Francisco, Cal., and Harold A. Black, of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee Societe Purfina.

Before DENMAN, MATHEWS, and STEPHENS, Circuit Judges.


Writ of Certiorari Denied April 5, 1943. See 63 S.Ct. 858, 87 L.Ed. ___.

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree based upon a libel filed November 18, 1940, and amended March 25, 1941, by Societe Purfina Maritime, a Belgian corporation, hereafter called Purfina, against Mitsubishi Shoji Kaisha, Ltd., a Japanese corporation, hereafter called Mitsubishi, and against the diesel oil cargo owned by General Petroleum Corporation of California, hereafter...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases