CARGILL, INC. v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 3714, 3725.

44 F.Supp. 368 (1942)

CARGILL, Inc., et al. v. UNITED STATES et al. INLAND WATERWAYS CORPORATION v. SAME.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

April 16, 1942.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Luther M. Walter, John S. Burchmore, Robert N. Burchmore, and Nuel D. Belnap, all of Chicago, Ill. (Walter Burchmore & Belnap, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff Cargill, Inc.

Nuel D. Belnap and Robert N. Burchmore, both of Chicago, Ill. (Walter, Burchmore & Belnap, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for plaintiff Inland Waterways Corp.

Leo P. Day, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant New York Central System.

Horace L. Walker, of Richmond, Va., and Bryce L. Hamilton, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant N. Y. C. & St. L. R. Co.

R. S. Brittingham, Jr., Sp. Asst. to Atty. Gen., Daniel H. Kunkel, of Washington, D. C., Atty. Interstate Commerce Commission, J. Albert Woll, U. S. Dist. Atty., of Chicago, Ill., for defendant U. S.

Frank H. Cole, Jr., of Cincinnati, Ohio, Erich W. Lademann, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant B. & O. R. R. Co.

Clyde E. Shorey, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant Erie R. R.

Theodore Schmidt and George F. Dyche, both of Chicago, Ill., for defendant Penn. R. Co.

Horace L. Walker, of Richmond, Va., and William G. Wise, of Chicago, Ill., for defendant C. & O. Ry. Co.

Kremer, Branand & Hayes, of Chicago, Ill., for intervenors A. L. Mechling, doing business as A. L. Mechling Barge Line.

Haskell Donoho, Senior Atty. U. S. Department of Agriculture, of Washington, D. C., for intervenor Secretary of Agriculture.

Mastin G. White, Sol. U. S. Department of Agriculture, of Washington, D. C., and A. B. Enoch, of Chicago, Ill., for intervenor Alton R. Co.

Before EVANS, Circuit Judge, and WOODWARD and HOLLY, District Judges.


WOODWARD, District Judge.

This cause coming on to be heard and the Court having heard arguments of counsel, and being fully advised in the premises, now makes the following findings of fact:

(1) Presently, and for many years, trunk line railroads operating to the east from Chicago, Illinois, including the carrier defendants herein, have maintained therefrom to eastern destinations proportional or reshipping rates on grain and grain products (hereinafter referred...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases