PITTSBURGH FORGINGS CO. v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 6684.

119 F.2d 619 (1941)

PITTSBURGH FORGINGS CO. et al. v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 31, 1941.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J., and Stephen H. Philbin, of New York City (William F. Hall, of Washington, D. C., and E. Ennalls Berl, of Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for petitioners.

Drury W. Cooper, of New York City (Albert M. Austin and Furman Rinehart, both of New York City, and Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for respondent.

Before BIGGS, MARIS, and JONES, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

After consideration of this case we have decided to grant leave to the petitioners to apply to the United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania for leave to file a complaint in the nature of a bill of review and for hearing, with directions to that court to take such action in the premises as may be required by law.

We say again, however, what we stated in the case of Raffold Process Corporation v. Castanea Paper Co., 3...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases