1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 43 F.Supp.
  5. 43 F.Supp. 332 (1941)
 

SCOTT & WILLIAMS v. WHISNANT

No. 184.

43 F.Supp. 332 (1941)

SCOTT & WILLIAMS, Inc., v. WHISNANT et al.

District Court, W. D. North Carolina.

September 19, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ward, Jones & Ward, of Asheville, N. C., and Howson & Howson, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Joseph L. Murphy, Jr., of Hickory, N. C., and Paul & Paul, of Philadelphia, Pa., for defendant.

WEBB, District Judge.

In this cause the Court finds the following facts:

1. The application for the patent in suit, No. 1,615,807, as filed under date of July 12, 1923, did not disclose Jose Bosch's alleged invention, nor the manner or process of making and constructing it, in such full, clear, concise and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to make and use the same, nor did it explain the principle thereof correctly, or the best mode of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases