LENROOT, Associate Judge.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for want of patentability in view of the cited prior art, claims 21, 30, 39 to 44, inclusive, 46, 47 and 49 of appellant's application for a patent. Claims 1, 3, 6, 8, 10 and 48 were allowed.
Claims 21, 44 and 46 are illustrative of the appealed claims and read as follows:
"21. Gear shifting...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.