1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 43 F.Supp.
  5. 43 F.Supp. 106 (1941)
 

IN RE CHOPAK

Misc. No. 573.

43 F.Supp. 106 (1941)

In re CHOPAK.

District Court, E. D. New York.

November 24, 1941.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold M. Kennedy, U. S. Atty., of Brooklyn (Frank J. Parker and Nathan Borock, Asst. U. S. Attys., both of Brooklyn, N. Y., of counsel), for the application.

Jules Chopak, of New York City, in pro. per.

M. & S. Meyers and Harry S. Austin, all of New York City, for Ole Hansen, in support of the application.

Before CAMPBELL, INCH, MOSCOWITZ, GALSTON, BYERS, and ABRUZZO, District Judges.

CAMPBELL, District Judge.

The above named attorney was presented for discipline on a number of charges. The testimony was taken before the Senior Judge, briefs were filed and the matter brought on for hearing before all of the judges of this court.

On the final hearing we informed Jules Chopak, the attorney, that the court would confine the hearing to the two following charges: first, the charge that said Jules Chopak improperly obtained from the libellant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases