1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 30 F.Supp.
  5. 30 F.Supp. 937 (1940)
 

MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS v. AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COM'N

No. 564-J.

30 F.Supp. 937 (1940)

MUTUAL ORANGE DISTRIBUTORS et al. v. AGRICULTURAL PRORATE COMMISSION OF CALIFORNIA et al.

District Court, S. D. California, Central Division.

January 23, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Crump & Rogers, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiffs.

Earl Warren, Atty. Gen., and Walter L. Bowers, Deputy Atty. Gen., for defendants.

George E. Farrand, Edward E. Tuttle, and Stephen M. Farrand, all of Los Angeles, Cal., for certain defendants T. H. Powell, L. R. Bradley, C. P. Foster, R. L. Willets, F. G. Webber, and Walter Shippey.

Before STEPHENS, Circuit Judge, and JAMES and HOLLZER, District Judges.

STEPHENS, Circuit Judge.

In this proceeding certain lemon growers and shippers of the State of California seek to have the members of the Agricultural Prorate Commission of the State of California and its "Zone Agent" enjoined from putting into effect the California State Prorate Act (Chapter 754, p. 1969 Calif.Stats. of 1933) or putting into effect the orders or program in respect thereof. We are now concerned with the application for an interlocutory restraining...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases