1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 113 F.2d
  5. 113 F.2d 381 (1940)
 

KESSEL v. VIDRIO PRODUCTS CORPORATION

No. 7203.

113 F.2d 381 (1940)

KESSEL et al. v. VIDRIO PRODUCTS CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

Rehearing Denied July 18, 1940.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Russell Wiles, Jules L. Brady, George A. Chritton, and Sol A. Hoffman, Chritton, Wiles, Davies, Hirschl & Dawson, all solicitors all of Chicago, Ill., for appellant.

Sidney J. Wolf, Arthur Wolf, J. H. Jochum, Jr., J. R. Cohler, and James J. Kelly, all of Chicago, Ill. (Sidney J. Wolf, J. Robert Cohler, and J. H. Jochum, Jr., all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellees.

Before EVANS and KERNER, Circuit Judges, and LINDLEY, District Judge.

LINDLEY, District Judge.

The District Court found defendant guilty of infringement of patent to Kessel No. 2,134,048, and ordered an injunction and accounting. Defendant, licensee of plaintiffs, appeals, contending that the device complained of, a small portable electric washing machine, is not within the scope of the patent properly construed and interpreted.

Kessel's application was successor to one made by himself and Goldblatt for the identical device...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases