IN RE NEWTON

Patent Appeal No. 4243.

110 F.2d 110 (1940)

In re NEWTON et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

February 26, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Roy W. Johns, of Philadelphia, Pa. (Norbert E. Birch, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

The Primary Examiner of the United States Patent Office, after allowing a number of claims in appellants' application for a patent for an invention described hereinafter, rejected claims 1, 8, 9 and 10. Upon appeal to the Board of Appeals, the decision of the examiner was affirmed, and appellants have appealed here from the decision of the board.

Claims 1 and 9 are regarded as illustrative, and follow:

"1. The method of producing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases