SCHICK DRY SHAVER v. MACY & CO.

No. 244.

112 F.2d 1007 (1940)

SCHICK DRY SHAVER, Inc., and Schick Industries, Limited, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. R. H. MACY & CO., Inc., Defendant-Appellant.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

June 26, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Abraham Tulin, Reginald Hicks and Samuel Yudell, all of New York City, for plaintiffs-appellees.

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, George E. Middleton, and H. Stanley Mansfield, all of New York City, for defendant-appellant.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


PER CURIAM.

The defendant appears to agree that in figure 11 of Fourniols the plate, as disclosed, was not of even thinness; and the disclosure was, indeed, at best very vague. This does not, however, change the result in the least. A shear-plate with angular slots will not make "area" shaving possible though uniform thinness be substituted for the taper. There is no patentable advance unless the slots are also parallel. Hence it would not have been an invention to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases