MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. TINDALL

No. 261.

30 F.Supp. 949 (1939)

MARYLAND CASUALTY CO. v. TINDALL et al.

District Court, W. D. Missouri, W. D.

December 28, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul G. Koontz, Harry F. Murphy, and Elliot Norquist, all of Kansas City, Mo., for plaintiff.

Walter A. Raymond and James H. Snyder, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Leslie Tindall.

Charles Miller and Fred Bellemere, both of Kansas City, Mo., for defendant Marshall's U. S. Auto Supply, Inc.


REEVES, District Judge.

This is an action for a declaratory judgment under Section 400, Title 28 U.S.C., 28 U.S.C.A. § 400. It is provided by this section that "in cases of actual controversy * * * the courts of the United States shall have power upon * * * complaint * * * to declare rights and other legal relations of any interested party petitioning for such declaration * * *."

The complainant in this case is an insurer and carries a policy of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases