IN RE KIMMEL


28 F.Supp. 942 (1939)

In re KIMMEL.

District Court, S. D. New York.

May 24, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Schatz, Holober & Phillips, of New York City (Charles Holober, of New York City, of counsel), for bankrupt.

Arthur L. Newman, II, of New York City (Herbert E. Kaufman, of New York City, of counsel), for judgment creditor.


CLANCY, District Judge.

This is a motion to vacate a stay of the collection of a judgment entered in the Municipal Court against the bankrupt.

The complaint in the Municipal Court was endorsed on the summons and stated an action for conversion. On the face of the summons was a claim that the defendant was liable to arrest. Defendant, the bankrupt, defaulted. The judgment was entered according to the recitals on its face upon an inquest taken before the Clerk...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases