1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 796 (1939)
 

STANSBURY v. MEYER

Patent Appeal No. 4148.

104 F.2d 796 (1939)

STANSBURY v. MEYER et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 26, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank H. Hubbard, of Milwaukee, Wis. (J. E. Hutchinson, Jr., of Washington, D. C., and William C. Lyon, of Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel), for appellant.

Clifton V. Edwards, of New York City, and John B. Brady, of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

This is an interference proceeding declared in the United States Patent Office between a patent, No. 2,002,281, issued to appellant May 21, 1935, on an application filed May 24, 1930, and a joint application of appellees filed January 17, 1928. Two counts, defining an electronic current regulator, are involved. They read:

"1. In combination, an alternating current supply, a circuit supplied thereby, and electron tube continuously...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases