H.P. HOOD & SONS v. U.S.

No. 772.

307 U.S. 588 (1939)

H.P. HOOD & SONS, INC. ET AL. v. UNITED STATES ET AL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided June 5, 1939.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Charles B. Rugg, with whom Messrs. Edward F. Merrill, Warren F. Farr, H. Brian Holland, and Archibald Cox were on the brief, for petitioners in Nos. 772 and 865.

Mr. John M. Raymond, with whom Messrs. Lawrence Foster and Augustin H. Parker, Jr. were on the brief, for petitioner in No. 809.

Solicitor General Jackson, with whom Assistant Attorney General Arnold and Messrs. Hugh B. Cox, James C. Wilson, and Robert K. McConnaughey were on a brief in Nos. 772 and 809, for respondents.


MR. JUSTICE REED delivered the opinion of the Court.

These cases involve the constitutionality of the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 19371 as applied in an order of the Secretary of Agriculture regulating the handling of milk in the Greater Boston, Massachusetts, Marketing Area.

The petitioners, H.P. Hood & Sons, Inc., and Noble's Milk Company of No. 772 and Whiting Milk Company of No. 809, original defendants below...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases