IN RE WADSWORTH

Patent Appeal No. 4199.

107 F.2d 596 (1939)

In re WADSWORTH et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

Rehearing Denied February 1, 1940.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pennie, Davis, Marvin & Edmonds, of New York City (Raymond F. Adams, of New York City, Clarence M. Fisher, of Washington, D. C., and Ambrose A. Arnold, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


LENROOT, Associate Judges.

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting claims 7 to 12, inclusive, of appellants' application for the reissue of a patent, No. 1,956,260, granted to them on April 24, 1934.

The ground of rejection was that substantially the same claims were cancelled by appellants during the prosecution of their original application...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases