1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 384 (1939)
 

IN RE SCHULTZ

Patent Appeal No. 4168.

104 F.2d 384 (1939)

In re SCHULTZ et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 5, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Watson, Bristol, Johnson & Leavenworth, of New York City (Clair V. Johnson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellants.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This appeal brings before us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, in view of the prior art, claims 14 to 17, inclusive, of appellants' application for a patent. No claims have been allowed.

Claim 17 is illustrative of the claims and reads as follows: "17. A process for the preparation of a flour from soy beans, which comprises preparing a flour...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases