1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 230 (1939)
 

L. SONNEBORN SONS, INC. v. COE

No. 7126.

104 F.2d 230 (1939)

L. SONNEBORN SONS, Inc. v. COE, Com'r of Patents.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Rehearing Denied May 18, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles S. Grindle, of Washington, D. C., and Joseph V. Meigs, of New York City, for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, Solicitor, United States Patent Office, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRONER, Chief Justice, and MILLER and VINSON, Associate Justices.

MILLER, Associate Justice.

The Patent Office rejected the claims in suit on the ground that they showed no invention over the prior art. Appellant, as assignee of the applicants, Silverman and Kessler, sued under Section 4915, R.S., 35 U.S.C.A. § 63. The lower court found that: "2. The Silverman and Kessler application discloses a process of treating a lubricating oil so as to lower the temperature point at which the oil ceases to flow (`the pour point'), said...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases