1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 104 F.2d
  5. 104 F.2d 196 (1939)
 

IN RE HOWARD

Patent Appeal No. 4157.

104 F.2d 196 (1939)

In re HOWARD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 5, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Bates, Golrick & Teare, of Cleveland, Ohio (Albert R. Teare and Walter F. Liesegang, both of Cleveland, Ohio, and Donald A. Gardiner, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the examiner rejecting, for the reasons hereinafter stated, claims 14, 15, and 18 to 21, inclusive, of appellant's application for a patent. Claims 16 and 17 were allowed.

Claims 14 and 18 are illustrative of the involved claims and read as follows:

"14. A method of making a paint brush comprising forming a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases