1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 102 F.2d
  5. 102 F.2d 964 (1939)
 

PITTSBURGH FORGINGS CO. v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 6684.

102 F.2d 964 (1939)

PITTSBURGH FORGINGS CO. et al. v. AMERICAN FOUNDRY EQUIPMENT CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.

March 23, 1939.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Hall, of Washington, D. C., and Thomas G. Haight, of Jersey City, N. J. (Reed, Smith, Shaw & McClay, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.

Drury W. Cooper and Albert M. Austin, both of New York City, Walter J. Blenko, of Pittsburgh, Pa., Furman Rinehart, of New York City, and Pepper, Bodine, Stokes & Schoch, of Philadelphia, Pa., for appellee.

Before DAVIS, MARIS, and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges.

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree of the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania holding the claims in suit of the Peik patent for a blasting machine valid and infringed. The appellant, Pangborn Corporation, is held to have infringed by making, using and selling the machines, and the appellant, Pittsburgh Forgings Company, by using the machines. The patent in suit is for a blasting machine which is used for cleaning castings...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases