STEENSTRUP v. HEATH

Patent Appeal No. 3940.

95 F.2d 514 (1938)

STEENSTRUP v. HEATH.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 28, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

F. Gerald Toye, of Washington, D. C., A. D. Salinger, of Boston, Mass., and Harry E. Dunham, of Schenectady, N. Y. (H. L. Kirkpatrick, of Boston, Mass., and Edwin L. Rich, of counsel), for appellant.

George H. Strickland, of Dayton, Ohio, for appellee.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee, the junior party.

The interference is between appellant's application No. 389,050, filed August 28, 1929, and appellee's application No. 510,688, filed January 23, 1931.

The invention in issue relates...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases