IN RE MURRAY

Patent Appeal No. 3900.

95 F.2d 336 (1938)

In re MURRAY.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 4, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Usina & Rauber, of New York City (Joseph H. Milans, of Washington, D. C., and D. A. Usina and Benjamin T. Rauber, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

By this appeal there is brought to us for review a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner denying patentability, in view of prior art cited, of a single claim, numbered 11, of an application filed January 19, 1935. Two claims numbered, respectively, 9 and 10, stand allowed. The rejected claim reads: "11. A furnace for boilers or the like for burning fuel in suspension having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases