1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 99 F.2d
  5. 99 F.2d 279 (1938)
 

WILLIAMS v. MURRAY

No. 4373.

99 F.2d 279 (1938)

WILLIAMS v. MURRAY et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

October 18, 1938.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Nettles, of Columbia, S. C. (John P. Grace, of Charleston, S. C., Eugene S. Blease, of Newberry, S. C., Claud N. Sapp, of Columbia, S. C., and J. Douglas Poteat, of Durham, N. C., on the brief), for appellant.

William M. Shand and Christie Benet, both of Columbia, S. C. (Benet, Shand & McGowan, of Columbia, S. C., on the brief), for appellees.

Before NORTHCOTT and SOPER, Circuit Judges, and WAY, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

This suit was brought by T. C. Williams against William S. Murray and Henry Flood, Jr. for breach of a contract dated April 15, 1926, which related to the water power site on the Saluda River belonging to the Lexington Water Power Company. The contract provided that in consideration of the delivery by Williams to Murray of an option on the stock of the Power Company, and the contribution of $50,000 each by Murray and Flood for the purchase of the stock...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases