QUEEN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA v. WINEMAN

No. 7455.

95 F.2d 1014 (1938)

QUEEN INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, Appellant, v. R. P. WINEMAN, Appellee.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

March 10, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fitzhugh, Murrah & Fitzhugh, of Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.

R. Lee Bartels and Alfred Sohm, both of Memphis, Tenn., for appellee.

Before SIMONS and ALLEN, Circuit Judges, and WEST, District Judge.


PER CURIAM.

It being the opinion of the court that there was substantial evidence upon which to submit to the jury an issue of fact as to whether or not the property insured by the policy upon which suit was brought was struck by lightning within the coverage of the policy, and it being further the opinion of the court that the excluded evidence was not an official record, nor that it was made admissible by the Act of June 20, 1936, c. 640, § 1, 49 Stat. 1561...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases