IN RE WALKER

Patent Appeals No. 4040.

99 F.2d 976 (1938)

In re WALKER et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 5, 1938.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Potter, Pierce & Scheffler, of Washington, D. C. (James F. Pierce and Charles H. Potter, both of Washington, D. C., and Eugene L. Greenewald, William F. Mesinger, and Warren J. Willis, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

R. F. Whitehead, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GARRETT, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, LENROOT, and JACKSON, Associate Judges.


JACKSON, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office which affirmed a decision of the examiner rejecting claims 14, 15, 17, and 18 of appellants' application for a patent for a blowpipe nozzle. No claims were allowed.

Claim 14 is illustrative and reads as follows:

"14. A blowpipe nozzle for removing surface metal from ferrous metal bodies by reaction with an oxidizing gas stream applied...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases