1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 89 F.2d
  5. 89 F.2d 709 (1937)
 

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. AMPEREX ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS

No. 315.

89 F.2d 709 (1937)

GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. v. AMPEREX ELECTRONIC PRODUCTS, Inc., et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 3, 1937.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Drury W. Cooper, John C. Kerr, and George F. Des Marais, all of New York City, for appellant.

Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, of counsel), for appellees.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

This suit is for infringement of two patents: Claims 1, 6, 8, and 14 of the Friederich patent, No. 1,393,520, for "Enclosed Arc Device and Method of Starting the Same"; and claims 1, 2, and 3 of the Meikle patent, No. 1,266,517, for a rectifier arc. The latter patent expired after the bill was filed and prior to the trial. The decision below held that none of the claims of the Friederich patent were infringed and the Meikle patent was held invalid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases