POSADAS v. NATIONAL CITY BANK

No. 114.

296 U.S. 497 (1936)

POSADAS, COLLECTOR OF INTERNAL REVENUE, v. NATIONAL CITY BANK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided January 6, 1936.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William Cattron Rigby for petitioner.

Mr. Carl A. Mead, with whom Mr. Harry W. Forbes was on the brief, for respondent.


MR. JUSTICE SUTHERLAND delivered the opinion of the Court.

The National City Bank of New York is organized under the National-Banking Act, as amended from time to time since its enactment. In 1930 the bank, after complying with the requirements of § 25 of the Federal Reserve Act of December 23, 1913, c. 6, 38 Stat. 251, 273, as amended September 7, 1916, c. 461, 39 Stat. 752, 755, infra, established branches at...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED


OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases