1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 85 F.2d
  5. 85 F.2d 574 (1936)
 

ACKER v. HAMILTON

No. 6620.

85 F.2d 574 (1936)

ACKER et al. v. HAMILTON et al.

United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia.

Decided June 29, 1936.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Leo A. Rover, of Washington, D. C., for appellants.

Brice Clagett, Charles E. Wainwright, George P. Barse, Roger J. Whiteford, and Leslie C. Garnett, U. S. Atty., and H. L. Underwood, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Washington, D. C., for appellees.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and VAN ORSDEL, GRONER, and STEPHENS, Associate Justices.

GRONER, Associate Justice.

This appeal was argued with No. 6626, Davis Trust Company, Trustee, et al. v. Cary A. Hardee, Receiver of Federal-American National Bank & Trust Company et al., 66 App.D.C. 168, 85 F.2d 571. There was the same objective in both suits, and the main question involved here was likewise involved and was decided in that case. We would feel constrained to affirm on the authority of the Davis Case without more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases