1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 78 F.2d
  5. 78 F.2d 653 (1935)
 

NACHMAN SPRING-FILLED CORPORATION v. KAY MFG. CORP.

No. 465.

78 F.2d 653 (1935)

NACHMAN SPRING-FILLED CORPORATION v. KAY MFG. CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

July 15, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Moses & Nolte, of New York City (Edmund Quincy Moses, of New York City, R. W. Lotz, of Chicago, Ill., and Clarence M. Crews, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Harry Jacobson, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., and John J. Sweedler, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiff sued for infringement of the Suekoff patent, No. 1,411,227, which was held valid and infringed. It also sued on the Suekoff patent, No. 1,352,157, which was held valid and infringed by defendant's tool, Exhibit 4, but not by its tools, Exhibits 5 and 6. Both plaintiff and defendant appeal.

Patent No. 1,411,227 was held valid by this court. Nachman Spring-Filled Corp. v. Spring Products Corp. (C. C. A.) 68 F...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases