1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 358 (1935)
 

MERCHANT TRUCKMEN'S BUREAU v. REARDON

10 F.Supp. 358 (1935)

MERCHANT TRUCKMEN'S BUREAU OF NEW YORK v. REARDON et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

On Rehearing April 3, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles E. Cotterill, of New York City, for petitioner.

Burlingham, Veeder, Clark & Hupper, of New York City (Windsor F. Cousins and H. Z. Maxwell, both of Philadelphia, Pa., and Ray Rood Allen, of New York City, of counsel), for respondents.

CAFFEY, District Judge.

With respect to several matters discussed in the argument, I think these things are clear and need not be further considered: (1) The petitioner is a competent complainant to the Commission; (2) what is presented to this court is not moot, the right to present it having been explicitly reserved at the hearing before the Examiner and the closing having been upon that condition (Minutes, pp. 44, 46, 88-95); (3) paragraph (3) of section 12 of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases