1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 78 F.2d
  5. 78 F.2d 283 (1935)
 

JOY v. WINDER

No. 1229.

78 F.2d 283 (1935)

JOY et al. v. WINDER.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

June 26, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Hatcher, of Chickasha, Okl. (Hatcher & Bond and Reford Bond, Jr., all of Chickasha, Okl., on the brief), for appellants.

A. L. Morrison, of El Reno, Okl. (Morrison, Morrison & Morrison, of El Reno, Okl., on the brief), for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, McDERMOTT, and BRATTON, Circuit Judges.

PHILLIPS, Circuit Judge.

Joy and Nelson have appealed from a judgment for personal injuries recovered against them by Mrs. Winder, plaintiff below. The sole question presented is the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict. In passing upon that question we must view the evidence in a light most favorable to plaintiff. Pennsylvania Steel Co. v. Jacobsen (C. C. A. 2) 157 F. 656, 657; Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. R. Co. v. Tharp (C. C. A. 6) 223 F. 615, 616...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases