1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 10 F.Supp.
  5. 10 F.Supp. 249 (1935)
 

MAY v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

No. 3617.

10 F.Supp. 249 (1935)

MAY et al. v. GOODYEAR TIRE & RUBBER CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

February 15, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Phipps, Durgin & Cook, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiffs.

Walter Powers (of Sherburne, Powers & Needham), of Boston, Mass., John Vaughan Groner (of Fish, Richardson & Neave), of New York City, and R. H. Waters, of Akron, Ohio, for defendant.

BREWSTER, District Judge.

This bill of complaint is brought to enjoin the use by defendant of registered trade-marks which, according to the allegations of the bill, infringe rights of the plaintiffs.

Statement of Facts.

The facts readily fall into several groups. I will first state those relating to the defendant's trade-marks and their use.

1. The defendant, Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, was incorporated under the laws of Ohio in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases