IN RE EAST CONTRA COSTA IRR. DIST

No. 24962.

10 F.Supp. 175 (1935)

In re EAST CONTRA COSTA IRR. DIST.

District Court, N. D. California, S. D.

March 13, 1935.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. L. Cowell, of Stockton, Cal., for petitioner.

Rogers, Clark & O'Brien, of San Francisco, Cal., for nonassenting creditors.


ST. SURE, District Judge.

I. The first ground of the motion to dismiss the petition is that it "does not state facts sufficient to entitle the petitioner to any relief herein." It is claimed that because "the petition does not state, inferentially or otherwise, that the creditors of the petitioner owning not less than thirty per centum in amount of its bonds, notes and certificates of indebtedness affected by the plan, excluding bonds, notes or certificates of indebtedness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases