1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 79 F.2d
  5. 79 F.2d 948 (1935)
 

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO.

Nos. 6917, 6918.

79 F.2d 948 (1935)

FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. v. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. UNITED STATES RUBBER CO. v. FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied December 9, 1935.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur C. Denison, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Albert L. Ely, of Akron, Ohio (Frank O. Richey, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.

Merrell E. Clark, of New York City (Newton A. Burgess and E. Clarkson Seward, both of New York City, and Fay, Oberlin & Fay, of Cleveland, Ohio, on the brief), for United States Rubber Co.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and SIMONS, Circuit Judges.

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

The suit below was for infringement of certain of the claims of each of a group of seven patents, which together are claimed to dominate and control the so-called drum process of building the outer casings of automobile tires. The plaintiff prevailed in many of its contentions as to validity and infringement, but failed in others, and both litigants have appealed; 6917 being the appeal of the defendant Firestone, and 6918 being the cross-appeal...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases