1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 5 F.Supp.
  5. 5 F.Supp. 822 (1934)
 

CITY OF TULSA v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.

No. 1293.

5 F.Supp. 822 (1934)

CITY OF TULSA v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE CO.

District Court, N. D. Oklahoma.

January 29, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

H. O. Bland, City Atty., Bert E. Johnson, Asst. City Atty., N. E. McNeill, and Davidson & Williams, all of Tulsa, Okl., for plaintiff.

Spielman, Cantrell & McCloud, of Oklahoma City, Okl., and Biddison, Campbell & Biddison, of Tulsa, Okl., for defendant.

FRANKLIN E. KENNAMER, District Judge.

Plaintiff's petition contains three causes of action. The first is to recover 4 per cent. of the gross revenue derived by defendant from its business at Tulsa from January 5, 1923, to June 1, 1932, under certain provisions of the city charter hereafter mentioned; the second is to eject defendant from the streets and alleys of the city; and the third is to recover damages for defendant's alleged unlawful use of the streets and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases