IN RE SPONABLE

Patent Appeal No. 3241.

69 F.2d 544 (1934)

In re SPONABLE.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 19, 1934.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Denison & Thompson, of Syracuse, N. Y. (E. A. Thompson, of Syracuse, N. Y., T. K. Bryant, of Washington, D. C., and George F. Scull, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


LENROOT, Associate Judge.

Appellant here seeks review of a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner, rejecting claims 7, 8, 10, and 11 of appellant's application for want of invention in view of the prior art. No claims were allowed.

Claim 11 is illustrative of the claims in issue and reads as follows: "11. An apparatus for reproducing combined moving and sound pictures comprising a screen consisting...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases