1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 71 F.2d
  5. 71 F.2d 172 (1934)
 

IN RE HEINTZ

Patent Appeal No. 3300.

71 F.2d 172 (1934)

In re HEINTZ.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 12, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hull, Brock & West and William E. Chilton, all of Cleveland, Ohio (George E. Tew, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

Appellant has appealed to this court from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming that of the Examiner in refusing to allow all the claims in his application for a patent.

The claimed invention relates to a method of retreading tires. The tire covered with new rubber is placed on a rim and inflated by an inner tube or bag so that the tire comes in contact with the outside members of the frames...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases