1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 68 F.2d
  5. 68 F.2d 164 (1934)
 

IN RE ROSS

Patent Appeal No. 3199.

68 F.2d 164 (1934)

In re ROSS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 22, 1934.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Blair, Curtis & Dunne, of New York City (Edward G. Curtis and William T. Kniesner, both of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirmed the action of the Examiner in denying patentability, in view of the prior art, of claims numbered 8, 10, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 31, 32, 33, 34, 40, 41, 60, and 61 of appellant's application for a patent on an automatic controlling apparatus. The Examiner allowed fifteen claims on different features of the device. From the decision of the board, appeal is taken to this court.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases