IN RE LILIENFELD

Patent Appeal No. 3201.

67 F.2d 920 (1933)

In re LILIENFELD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 30, 1933.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Newton M. Perrins and Daniel I. Mayne, both of Rochester, N. Y. (Henry S. Boynton, of Rochester, N. Y., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner, rejecting, for want of invention, claims 15 to 18, inclusive, and claims 25, 26, 27, and 38 of appellant's application, No. 436,604, filed January 11, 1921.

Claims 15, 17, and 25 are illustrative, and read as follows:

"15. Alkali cellulose containing substantially over 60% caustic alkali, and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases