1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 64 F.2d
  5. 64 F.2d 807 (1933)
 

PUEBLO DE TAOS v. ARCHULETA

Nos. 645, 732.

64 F.2d 807 (1933)

PUEBLO DE TAOS v. ARCHULETA et al. SAME v. ANAYA et al. (VAN VECHTEN, Intervener).

Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

April 10, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

R. H. Hanna and William A. Brophy, both of Albuquerque, N. M. (Fred E. Wilson, of Albuquerque, N. M., on the brief), for appellant.

Carl H. Gilbert, of Santa Fé, N. M. (M. W. Hamilton, of Santa Fé, N. M., on the brief), amici curiæ, and for appellee Van Vechten.

Before COTTERAL and McDERMOTT, Circuit Judges, and JOHNSON, District Judge.

McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.

These cases present the epilogue of the controversy between the Pueblo of Taos and the non-Indian settlers who claim title to many tracts of land formerly owned by the Pueblo in communal title. The Pueblo Lands Act (43 Stat. 636 [25 USCA § 331 note]) provided elaborate machinery for the determination of the many disputes that arose over Pueblo titles after the decision of the Sandoval and Candelaria Cases (231 U.S. 28...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases