1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 66 F.2d
  5. 66 F.2d 744 (1933)
 

CINEMA PATENTS CO. v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES

No. 372.

66 F.2d 744 (1933)

CINEMA PATENTS CO., Inc., v. WARNER BROS. PICTURES, Inc.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

September 12, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kiddle, Margeson & Hornidge, of New York City (Henry T. Hornidge, William J. Dowd, and Herbert A. Huebner, all of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City (William E. Beatty, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

The patents in suit relate to machine processing of motion picture film. Processing a photographic film involves the steps of developing, fixing, washing, and drying. Although additional steps, such as coloring, or hardening with alum, may be introduced, the present case is concerned only with the four first mentioned. Originally each step was performed manually. The exposed but undeveloped photographic film was cut into sections of about 200...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases