1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 66 F.2d
  5. 66 F.2d 592 (1933)
 

CINCINNATI CAR CO. v. NEW YORK RAPID TRANSIT CORP.

No. 429.

66 F.2d 592 (1933)

CINCINNATI CAR CO. v. NEW YORK RAPID TRANSIT CORPORATION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

August 1, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Toulmin & Toulmin, of Dayton, Ohio, and Curtin & Glynn, of New York City (Baker, Hostetler, Sidlo & Patterson and Arthur C. Denison, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and H. A. Toulmin, Jr., of Dayton, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

Alfred W. Kiddle, Harry E. Knight, Herbert H. Knight, and William J. Dowd, all of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, AUGUSTUS N. HAND, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.

L. HAND, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiff sued the defendant for infringement of patent No. 1,501,325, issued on July 15, 1924, to Thomas Elliott, and included two others in the bill. We held the patent just mentioned, and one of the others infringed; the third, not infringed. Cincinnati Car Co. v. New York Rapid Transit Co., 35 F.2d 679. Later we suspended the injunction to allow the defendant to substitute another device.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases