1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 62 F.2d
  5. 62 F.2d 365 (1933)
 

WOELM v. HASSELQUIST

Patent Appeal No. 3038.

62 F.2d 365 (1933)

WOELM v. HASSELQUIST.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 3, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warfield, Fraser & Brown, of New York City (Donald L. Brown, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant.

Cromwell, Greist & Warden, of Chicago, Ill. (Raymond L. Greist, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee.

The count in issue was taken from appellant's patent No. 1,700,246, issued January 29, 1929, on an application filed June 1, 1923. It reads: "2. In a step-by-step pencil mechanism, the combination of a plurality...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases