1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 66 F.2d
  5. 66 F.2d 174 (1933)
 

HICKMAN COUNTY v. NASHVILLE BRIDGE CO.

No. 6262.

66 F.2d 174 (1933)

HICKMAN COUNTY v. NASHVILLE BRIDGE CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

June 30, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. P. Hatcher, of Nashville, Tenn. (R. L. Peery, of Centerville, Tenn., and Pitts, McConnico & Hatcher, all of Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellant.

A. H. Roberts, of Nashville, Tenn. (Roberts & Roberts, of Nashville, Tenn., on the brief), for appellee.

Before MOORMAN, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

Objection is made by the appellee to a consideration of the questions argued on this appeal on the ground that the assignments of error are insufficient under rule 11 of this court. We think the assignments are too general, but it is within the province of the court to notice plain error not assigned (The Myrtle M. Ross, 160 F. 19, 22 (6 C. C. A.), and in view of the interests involved in the litigation we deem it appropriate to consider the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases