1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 64 F.2d
  5. 64 F.2d 999 (1933)
 

IN RE PATTERSON

Patent Appeal No. 3142.

64 F.2d 999 (1933)

In re PATTERSON.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 22, 1933.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Carl T. Mack, of Washington, D. C. (Royce A. Ruess, of Washington, D. C., and John A. Naismith, of San Jose, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

LENROOT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner, rejecting all of the claims of appellant's application, 1 to 9, inclusive, for want of invention over the prior art.

Claims 1, 3, and 8 are illustrative of the claims on appeal and read as follows:

"1. A playground apparatus comprising, a central support, a plurality of annularly disposed supports...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases